Drivers of Suspicious Transaction Reporting Levels: Evidence from a Legal and Economic Perspective

Braun Julia, Matthias Kasper, Alicja Majdanska, Maryte Somare

Abstract


Suspicious transaction reporting (STR) is a cornerstone of the international Anti-Money Laundering/Combatting the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) framework. The evaluation of AML/CFT regimes is challenging, however, as the quality of STRs varies substantially between countries and little is known about the factors that drive STR. In combining legal and economic analyses, this article evaluates various factors that potentially explain STR levels. The analysis of the AML/CFT legislation in nine jurisdictions reveals that well-established legal and institutional structures promote the effectiveness of STR systems. In particular, the legal analysis shows that the scope of predicate offenses in national criminal law, as well as a penalty regime for non-compliance with the obligations under national AML/CFT legislation, seem to increase the quantity of STRs. Overly strict penalty regimes and insufficient training of entities with reporting obligations, on the other hand, likely stimulate over-reporting. Based on these findings, we econometrically investigate potential determinants of STR levels for 54 countries from 2006 to 2012. We find that high STR numbers indicate high levels of illegal activities such as terrorism and organized crime. Moreover, mutual evaluations of countries’ AML/CFT frameworks entail a short-term increase in the number of STRs.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allingham, M., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3-4), 323-338.

Barth, J.R., Caprio, G., jr., & Levine, R. (2013). Bank Regulation and Supervision in 180 Countries from 1999 to 2011. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 18733. doi: 10.3386/w18733

Chaikin, D. (2009). How effective are suspicious transaction reporting systems? Journal of Money Laundering Control, 12(3), 238-253. doi:10.1108/13685200910973628

Cindori, S. (2013). Money laundering: correlation between risk assessment and suspicious transactions. Financial Theory and Practice, 37(2), 181-206. doi:10.3326/fintp.37.2.3

EUROSTAT. (2013). Money Laundering in Europe. Luxembourg: European Union. doi: 10.2785/415

FATF. (2003). The Forty Recommendations. Paris: FATF.

FATF. (2005). Summary of the Third Mutual Evaluation Report. Paris: FATF.

FATF. (2008). Mutual Evaluation Report, Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Functioning of Terrorism. Mexico. Paris: FATF.

FATF. (2009). Rapport d’évaluation mutuelle. Rapport de suivi. Lutte contre le blanchiment de capitaux et le financement du terrorisme. Suisse. Paris: FATF.

FATF. (2010). Mutual Evaluation Report, Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Functioning of Terrorism. Germany. Paris: FATF.

FATF. (2012). International Standards of Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism and Proliferation, The FATF Recommendations. Paris: FATF.

FATF. (2014a). Follow-Up Report Mutual Evaluation Report. Austria. Paris: FATF.

FATF. (2014b). Follow-Up Report Mutual Evaluation Report. Mexico. Paris: FATF.

Gravelle, J. (2015). Tax havens: International Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion. Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40623.pdf.

Halliday, T., Levi, M., & Reuter, P. (2014). Global Surveillance of Dirty Money: Assessing Assessments of Regimes to control Money-Laundering and Combat the Financing of Terrorism. Center on Law and Globalization. Retrieved from http://www.lexglobal.org/files/Report_Global%20Surveillance%20of%20Dirty%20Money%201.30.2014.pdf.

International Monetary Fund. (2007). Thailand: Detailed Assessment Report on Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.

Johnson, J., & Desmond Lim, Y. (2003). Money laundering: has the Financial Action Task Force made a difference? Journal of Financial Crime, 10(1), 7-22. doi:10.1108/13590790310808556

Johnston, R. B., & Carrington, I. (2006). Protecting the financial system from abuse: challenges to banks in implementing AML/CFT standards. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 9(1), 48 - 61. doi:10.1108/13685200610645210

KPMG. (2003). Money Laundering: Review of the Reporting System. KPMG. Retrieved from http://www.dematerialisedid.com/PDFs/kpmgreport.pdf.

MENAFATF. (2008). Mutual Evaluation Report, Qatar. MENAFATF.

MENAFATF. (2012). Mutual Evaluation Report, Qatar. MENAFATF.

Moneyval. (2001). First Mutual Evaluation Report on Latvia, Summary. Council of Europe.

Moneyval. (2006). Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism. Council of Europe.

Moneyval. (2012). Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism. Council of Europe.

Moneyval. (2014). Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism. Council of Europe.

OECD. (2014). Illicit Financial Flows from Developing Countries: Measuring OECD Responses. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Puffer, S., McCarthy, D., & Jaeger, A. (2016). Institution building and institutional voids. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 11(1), 18-41.

Roule, T., & Kinsell, J. (2003). Legislative and bureaucratic impediments to suspicious transaction reporting regimes. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 6(2), 151-156.

Schjelderup, G. (2016). Secrecy Jurisdictions. International Tax and Public Finance, 23(1), 168-189.

Schneider, F., Buehn, A., & Montenegro, C. (2010). New Estimates for the Shadow Economies all over the World. International Economic Journal, 24(4), 443-461.

Takats, E. (2011). A Theory of “Crying Wolf”: The Economics of Money Laundering Enforcement. The Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 27(1), 32-78.

Terry, L. S. (2010). An Introduction to the Financial Action Task Force and its 2008 Lawyer Guidance. Journal of the Professional Lawyer, 20(3), 3-67.

Vaithilingam, S., & Nair, M. (2007). Factors affecting money laundering: lesson for developing countries. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 10(3), 352-366.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright ©  Journal of Tax Administration. All rights reserved. | Hosted by Docuracy Ltd | Powered by Open Journal Systems