Income Tax Versus Value Added Tax: A Mixed-Methods Comparison of Social Representations
Abstract
To date, tax research has strongly focused on income tax compliance. Meanwhile, a large proportion of tax revenue is raised by consumption taxes, such as value added tax (VAT). This study compared the respective social representations of income tax and VAT by employed and self-employed taxpayers. The aim was to gain an understanding of similarities and differences in the overall quantitative evaluation and qualitative content of the two taxes. For this purpose, we administered a free association task to employed (n = 140) and self-employed (n = 349) Austrian taxpayers with the stimuli income tax and VAT (between-subject design). Moreover, we measured emotional reactions and knowledge referring to the two types of taxes as well as individuals’ mental accounting practices. Our results revealed that both taxes were evaluated negatively overall, although they did not differ from each other in their quantitative evaluation. Regarding employment status, self-employed taxpayers generated a larger number of negative associations, had higher knowledge, and expressed more negative emotions than employed taxpayers. The qualitative analysis also revealed that the social representations were specific to the two taxes. We conclude that findings from income tax research cannot be directly translated to the context of VAT.
References
Abdi, H., & Valentin, D. (2007). Multiple correspondence analysis. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics (pp. 651-657). London: SAGE Publications.
Adams, C. J., & Webley, P. (2001). Small business owner’s attitudes on VAT compliance in the UK. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 195-216. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(01)00029-0
Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3-4), 323-338.
Austrian income tax law, § 33 Abs. 1 EStG 1988 (2015). Retrieved from https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Bundesnormen/NOR40174043/NOR40174043.pdf
Barthes, A., & Jeziorski, A. (2012). What kind of critical university education for sustainable development? A comparative study of European students and social representations, in the epistemological and didactical challenges involved in teaching socially acute questions. Journal of Social Science Education, 11(4), 405-417.
Bergman, M., & Nevarez, A. (2006). Do audits enhance compliance: An empirical assessment of VAT enforcement. National Tax Journal, 59(4), 817-832.
Bird, R. (2010). Visibility and accountability: Is tax-inclusive pricing a good thing? Canadian Tax Journal, 58(1), 63-76.
Balafoutas, L., Beck, A., Kerschbamer, R., & Sutter, M. (2015). The hidden costs of tax evasion. Journal of Public Economics, 129, 14-25. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.06.003
Boadway, R., Marceau, N., & Mongrain, S. (2002). Joint tax evasion. Canadian Journal of Economics, 35(3), 417-435. doi:10.1111/1540-5982.00138
Braithwaite, V. (2003). Dancing with tax authorities: Motivational postures and non-compliant actions. In V. Braithwaite (Ed.), Taxing democracy: Understanding tax avoidance and evasion (pp. 15-39). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Chang, J. J., & Lai, C. C. (2004). Collaborative tax evasion and social norms: Why deterrence does not work. Oxford Economic Papers-New Series, 56(2), 344-368. doi:10.1093/oep/gpf045
Charlet, A., & Owens, J. (2010). An international perspective on VAT. Tax Notes International, 59(12), 943-954.
Chetty, R., Looney, A., & Kroft, K. (2009). Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1145-1177. doi:10.1257/aer.99.4.1145
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Cuccia, A. D., & Carnes, G. A. (2001). A closer look at the relation between tax complexity and tax equity perceptions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(2), 113-140. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(01)00025-3
De Rosa, A. S. (1995). Le „réseau d‘associations“ comme methode d‘etude dans la recherche sur les representations sociales: Structure, contenus et polarite du champ semantique. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 15, 145-157.
Duveen, G., & Lloyd, B. (1990). Introduction. In G. Duveen & B. Lloyd (Eds.) Social Representations and the Development of Knowledge (pp. 1-10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eichfelder, S., & Vaillancourt, F. (2014). Tax compliance costs: A review of cost burdens and cost structures. Hacienda Publica Espanola, 210(3), 111-148. doi:10.7866/HPE-RPE.14.3.5
El Sehity, T., & Kirchler, E. (2006). Soziale Repräsentationen (Vorstellungen). In H.-W. Bierhoff & D. Frey (Eds.), Handbuch der Sozialpsychologie und Kommunikationspsychologie (pp. 486-493). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Feinstein, J. (1991). An econometric analysis of income tax evasion and its detection. The RAND Journal of Economics, 22(1), 14-35. doi:10.2307/2601005
Gangl, K., Kastlunger, B., Kirchler, E., & Voracek, M. (2012). Confidence in the economy in times of crisis: Social representations of experts and laypeople. Journal of Socio-Economics, 41, 603-614. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2012.05.018
Greenacre, M. (1991). Interpreting multiple correspondence analysis. Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, 7(2), 195-210. doi:10.1002/asm.3150070208
Greenacre, M. (2007). Correspondence analysis in practice. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
James, K. (2015). The rise of the value-added tax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
James, S., & Edwards, A. (2008). Developing tax policy in a complex and changing world. Economic Analysis and Policy, 38(1), 35-53. doi:10.1016/S0313-5926(08)50005-1
Keen, M., & Smith, S. (2006). VAT fraud and evasion: What do we know and what can be done? National Tax Journal, 59(4), 861-887.
Kirchler, E. (1998). Differential representations of taxes: Analysis of free associations and judgments of five employment groups. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 27(1), 117–131. doi:10.1016/S1053-5357(99)80080-8
Kirchler, E. (2007). The economic psychology of tax behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kirchler, E., & Maciejovsky, B. (2001). Tax compliance within the context of gain and loss situations, expected and current asset position, and profession. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(2), 173-194. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(01)00028-9
Kirchler, E., Maciejovsky, B., & Schneider, F. (2003). Everyday representations of tax avoidance, tax evasion, and tax flight: Do legal differences matter? Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(4), 535-553. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00164-2
Kogler, C., Muehlbacher, S., & Kirchler, E. (2015). Testing the “slippery slope framework” among self-employed taxpayers. Economics of Governance, 16(2), 125-142. doi:10.1007/s10101-015-0158-9
Krause, K. (2000). Tax complexity: Problem or opportunity? Public Finance Review, 28(5), 395-414. doi:10.1177/109114210002800501
Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C. W., & Tausch, A. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der "Positive and Negative Affect Schedule" (PANAS). Diagnostica, 42, 139-156.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observed agreement for categorical data. Biometric, 33(1), 159-174.
Lignier, P., & Evans, C. (2012). The rise and rise of tax compliance costs for the small business sector in Australia. Australian Tax Forum, 27(3), 615-672.
Lignier, P., Evans, C., & Tran-Nam, B. (2014). Tangled up in tape: The continuing tax compliance plight of the small and medium enterprise business sector. Australian Tax Forum, 29(2), 217-248.
Moliner, P., & Tafani, E. (1997). Attitudes and social representations: A theoretical and experimental approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27(6), 687-702.
Moscovici, S. (1961). La Psychanalyse, son Image et son Public. Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.
Moscovici, S. (1976). La psychanalyse, son image, son public [Psychoanalysis, its image and its public]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Muehlbacher, S., Hartl, B., & Kirchler, E. (2015). Mental accounting and tax compliance: Experimental evidence of mental segregation of tax due and revenue on compliance. Public Finance Review, 1-22. doi:10.1177/1091142115602063
Muehlbacher, S., Hartl, B., & Kirchler, E. (2014). Mental Accounting als Persönlichkeitsmerkmal. Eine Skala zur Erfassung der mentalen Buchführung. Paper presented at 11th Scientific Meeting of the Austrian Society for Psychology (ÖGP), Vienna, Austria, 24-26 April 2014.
Muehlbacher, S., & Kirchler, E. (2013). Mental accounting of self-employed taxpayers: On the mental segregation of the net income and the tax due. FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, 69(4), 412-438. doi:10.1628/001522113X675656
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Dennis, S. (2000). What is free association and what does it measure. Memory & Cognition, 28(6), 887-899.
OECD. (2014). Consumption Tax Trends 2014. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/ctt-2014-en
OECD. (2015). Revenue Statistics 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/rev_stats-2015-en-fr
OECD. (2016). Taxing Wages 2016. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/tax_wages-2016-en
Rodler, C., Kirchler, E. & Hoelzl, E. (2001). Gender stereotypes of leaders: An analysis of the contents of obituaries from 1974 to 1998. Sex Roles, 45(11-12), 827-843.
Rogelberg, S. G., Conway, J. M., Sederburg, M. E., Spitzmuller, C., Aziz, S., & Knight, W. E. (2003). Profiling active and passive nonrespondents to an organizational survey. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 1104-1114. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1104
Sausgruber, R., & Tyran, J. R. (2005). Testing the Mill hypothesis of fiscal illusion. Public Choice, 122(1-22), 39-68. doi:10.1007/s11127-005-3992-4
Schenk, A., & Oldman, O. (2006). Value added tax: A comparative approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmölders, G. (1960). Das Irrationale in der öffentlichen Finanzwirtschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Schnabel, K., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2013). Free associations as a measure of stable implicit attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 27, 39-50. doi:10.1002/per.1890
Slemrod, J. B., & Venkatesh, V. (2002). The income tax compliance cost of large and mid-size businesses. Ross School of Business Paper No. 914. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.913056
Sussman, A. B., & Olivola, C. Y. (2011). Axe the tax: Taxes are disliked more than equivalent costs. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(SPL), 91-101. doi:10.1509/jmkr.48.SPL.S91
Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199-214. doi:10.1287/mksc.4.3.199
Thaler, R. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3), 183-206.
Vergès, P. (1992). L’evocation de l’argent: Une mèthode pour la définition du noyau central d’une représentation. Bulletin de Psychologie, 45, 203-209.
Wagner, W. (1994). Alltagsdiskurs. Die Theorie sozialer Repräsentationen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Farr, R., Jovchelovitch, S., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Marková, I., & Rose, D. (1999). Theory and method of social representations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 95-125.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
Webley, P., Adams, C., & Elffers, H. (2006). Value added tax compliance, In E. J. McCaffery & J. Slemrod (Eds.), Behavioral public finance: Toward a new agenda (pp. 175-205). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
Webley, P., & Ashby, J. (2010). The economic psychology of value added tax compliance. In J. Alm, J. Martinez-Vazquez, & B. Torgler (Eds.), Developing alternative frameworks for explaining tax compliance (pp. 238-259). Abingdon: Routledge.
WKO. (2015). Abgaben und Steuern. Retrieved from https://www.wko.at/Content.Node/Service/Steuern/Neugruendung--Uebergabe--Aufgabe/Neugruendung--steuerrechtlich-/neugr_SteuerinformationfuerBetriebsgruender_Broschuere.pdf
Yaniv, G. (1999). Tax compliance and advance tax payments. National Tax Journal, 52(4), 753-764.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Jerome Olsen, Christoph Kogler, Jennifer Stark, Erich Kirchler
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our open access status means that authors retain the copyright of their work. However, all papers published in JOTA are done so under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY). This means that others can share and/or adapt your work without your permission as long as they follow certain rules, including attributing your work correctly.
You can learn more about this on our Open Access, Licensing, and Copyright Policies page.