The Case for Stronger Scrutiny of the Deductibility of Crypto Losses
Keywords:
Crypto Losses, Cryptoassets, Crypto TaxationAbstract
Crypto losses have the potential to adversely impact the tax base, particularly if they are deducted against income from other profitable sources. There is a key question of fairness as to whether crypto losses should be cross-subsidised by income from other sources that may have nothing to do with cryptoassets at all. This article argues for stronger scrutiny of the deductibility of crypto losses at the stage of determining whether such losses can be set off against income from other sources or at the stage of the shifting of the losses across time and between companies. It explains why crypto losses are of particular concern to tax systems and considers how safeguards can be put in place at both stages to safeguard the tax base. In particular, it suggests that specific crypto legislation should be enacted in order to impose a loose “source matching” requirement on crypto losses. Crypto losses from the carrying on of a trade or business should only be deductible against crypto income. That said, there is probably no need to strictly require that the source of the crypto losses must exactly match the source of the crypto income which is sought to be deducted.
References
Adams, A., & Ibert, M. (2022, June 2). Runs on algorithmic stablecoins: Evidence from Iron, Titan, and Steel. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/runs-on-algorithmic-stablecoins-evidence-from-iron-titan-and-steel-20220602.html
Bacon, J., Michels, J. D., Millard, C., & Singh, J. (2018). Richmond Journal of Law and Technology, 25(1), Article 2.
Baur, D. G., & Dimpfl, T. (2021). The volatility of Bitcoin and its role as a medium of exchange and a store of value. Empirical Economics, 61, 2663–2683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01990-5
Bettes, K. (2022, June 29). Crypto crash: Why has cryptocurrency dropped? UNSW Sydney Newsroom. https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2022/06/crypto-crash-why-has-cryptocurrency-dropped
Briola, A., Vidal-Tomás, D., Wang, Y., & Aste, T. (2023). Anatomy of a stablecoin’s failure: The Terra-Luna case. Finance Research Letters, 51, 103358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103358
Clements, R. (2021). Built to fail: The inherent fragility of algorithmic stablecoins. Wake Forest Law Review, 11, 131―145. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3952045
CoinGecko. (2024). Overall cryptocurrency market capitalization per week from July 2010 to August 2024 (in billion U.S. dollars) [Graph]. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/730876/cryptocurrency-maket-value/
Conlon, T., Corbet, S., & Hu, Y. (2023). The collapse of the FTX exchange: The end of cryptocurrency’s age of innocence. The British Accounting Review, 101277. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2023.101277
Ehrlich, S. (2022, May 10). Unstable stablecoin: How crypto’s crash broke the buck for TerraUSD. Forbes.com. https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevenehrlich/2022/05/10/unstable-stablecoin-how-cryptos-crash-broke-the-buck-for-terrausd/?sh=1164e2ee6ff4
Elender, H., Trimborn, S., Ong, B., & Ming Lee, T. (2018). The cross-section of crypto-currencies as financial assets: Investing in crypto-currencies beyond Bitcoin. In Lee, D., & Deng, R. H. (Eds.), Handbook of blockchain, digital finance, and inclusion (Vol. 1), pp. 145–173.
European Commission. (2022, 8 December). Proposal for a council directive amending directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation, {SEC(2022) 438 final} - {SWD(2022) 400 final} - {SWD(2022) 401 final} - {SWD(2022) 402 final}. European Commission. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52022PC0707
European Commission. (2023, October 17). Council directive (EU) 2023/2226 of 17 October 2023 amending directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation. European Commission. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202302226&qid=1725699590693
Financial Action Task Force. (2021). Virtual assets and virtual asset service providers: Updated guidance for a risk-based approach. FATF. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/guidance/Updated-Guidance-VA-VASP.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf
Garcia-Teruel, R. M., & Simón-Moreno, H. (2021). The digital tokenization of property rights. A comparative perspective. Computer Law and Security Review, 41, 105543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105543
The Goods and Services Act 1993 (Singapore).
Hammer, S. (2022, May 20). Wharton expert explains the crashing cryptomarket. Penn Today. https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/wharton-expert-explains-crashing-crypto-market
Harris, P. (2002). Metamorphosis of the Australasian Income Tax: 1866-1922 (Australian Taxation Research Foundation Research Study No. 37). Australian Tax Research Foundation.
HM Government. (1922). Report of the inter-departmental committee on income tax in the colonies not possessing responsible government. H. M. Stationery Office,
HM Revenue & Customs. (2023). Cryptoassets manual. HM Revenue & Customs. https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/cryptoassets-manual
Income Tax Act 1947 (Rev. Ed. 2020)(Singapore).
King, P. (2022, June 23). Careful with those crypto losses, tax office warns. Accountants Daily. https://www.accountantsdaily.com.au/tax-compliance/17204-careful-with-those-crypto-losses-tax-office-warns
Laws of Malaysia, Act 53, Income Act 1967.
Laws of Malaysia, Act 812, Finance Act 2018.
Lennon, H. (2022, August 1). Bankrupt crypto lender Celsius could leave customers last in line to get paid. Forbes.com. https://www.forbes.com/sites/haileylennon/2022/08/01/bankrupt-crypto-lender-celsius-could-leave-customers-last-in-line-to-get-paid/?sh=47f33f7c5fde
Lim, W. (2021). Taxation of non-fungible tokens. Australian Tax Review, 50(4), 270–279.
Loh, D. (2022, July 29). Crypto exchange Zipmex seeks bankruptcy protection in Singapore. Nikkei Asia. https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Cryptocurrencies/Crypto-exchange-Zipmex-seeks-bankruptcy-protection-in-Singapore
The Model Colonial Territories Income Tax Ordinance 1922.
Ooi, V. (December 2017). Business vehicles. Singapore Management University. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2829/
Ooi, V. (2019). Taxing ‘all other income’ in Singapore and Malaysia. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 19(2), 204–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2019.1665764
Ooi, V. (2021). The taxation of cryptocurrency gains. Bulletin for International Taxation, 75(7), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.59403/4nh2z9
Ooi, V., Kian Peng, S., & Soh, J. (2022). Blockchain land transfers: Technology, promises, and perils. Computer Law & Security Review, 45, 10562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105672
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Taxing virtual currencies: An overview of tax treatments and emerging tax policy issues. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/taxing-virtual-currencies-an-overview-of-tax-treatments-and-emerging-tax-policy-issues.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Crypto-asset reporting framework and amendments to the common reporting standard. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/tax/exchange-of-tax-information/crypto-asset-reporting-framework-and-amendments-to-the-common-reporting-standard.pdf
Royal Commission on the Taxation of Profits and Income. (1955). Final report of the Royal Commission on the Taxation of Profits and Income (Cmnd. 9474). H.M. Stationery Office.
Sigalos, M. (2022, July 12). Founders of bankrupt crypto hedge fund 3AC go missing, as investors try to recoup assets. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/12/founders-of-bankrupt-crypto-hedge-fund-three-arrows-go-missing.html
Swiss Financial Supervisory Authority FINMA. (2018, 16 February). FINMA publishes ICO guidelines [Press release]. https://www.finma.ch/en/news/2018/02/20180216-mm-ico-wegleitung/
Teo, K. S. (1996). Badges of trade revisited. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 1996, 43–78.
Thuronyi, V. (1998). Tax law design and drafting (Vol. 2). International Monetary Fund.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Vincent Ooi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our open access status means that authors retain the copyright of their work. However, all papers published in JOTA are done so under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY). This means that others can share and/or adapt your work without your permission as long as they follow certain rules, including attributing your work correctly.
You can learn more about this on our Open Access, Licensing, and Copyright Policies page.