From Moral Duty to Legal Rule – A Blueprint for Reform of Taxpayer Rights to Fair Treatment in the UK and Australia
Abstract
Tax authorities both in the UK and Australia aspire to treat taxpayers fairly. This article assesses the extent to which these aspirations have been recognised in formal legal rules in both countries. It shows that neither jurisdiction has imposed on the Revenue any broad express legal obligation to treat taxpayers fairly. The legislatures in both jurisdictions have largely left the matter to the judiciary. As a consequence, neither country is far advanced along the path to translating the moral duty of tax officials to treat taxpayers fairly into a clear and certain legal right. This chapter proposes a number of reforms which, taken together, set out a blueprint for addressing this situation. The proposed reforms comprise legislative clarification of taxpayer rights to fair treatment, taxpayer rights to compensation for serious failures to treat taxpayers fairly and formal monitoring and sanctions to ensure compliance with Revenue commitments to treat taxpayers fairly.
References
Allars, Margaret, (1996) “Tort and Equity Claims Against the State” in Paul Finn (ed), Essays on Law and Government (North Ryde: Law Book Company, Vol. 2, 49.
Bamforth, Nicholas, (1997) “Fairness and Legitimate Expectation in Judicial Review” Cambridge Law Journal 56, 1.
Bentley, Duncan, (1995) “A Taxpayers Charter: Opportunity or Token Gesture” Australian Tax Forum 12,1.
Bentley, Duncan, (2007) Taxpayers’ Rights: Theory, Origin and Implementation (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer,).
Bevacqua, John, (2011) ‘Public Policy Concerns in Taxpayer Claims against the Commissioner of Taxation – Myths and Realities’ Australian Tax Review 40, 10.
Bevacqua, John, 92011) Taxpayer Rights to Compensation for Tax Office Mistakes (Sydney: CCH,).
Clayton, Richard, (2003) “Legitimate Expectations, Policy and the Principle of Consistency” Cambridge Law Journal 62, 93.
Cohen, David, (1990) “Suing the State” University of Toronto Law Journal 40 ,630.
Cowell, Frank, (1992) “Tax Evasion and Inequity” Journal of Economic Psychology 13,521.
Falkinger, Josef, (1995) “Tax Evasion, Consumption of Public Goods and Fairness” Journal of Economic Psychology 16, 63.
Finn, Chris, (2002) “The Justiciability of Administrative Decisions: A Redundant Concept?” Federal Law Review 30, 239.
Fordham, Michael, (2003) “Reparation for Maladministration: Public Law’s Final Frontier” Judicial Review 8, 104.
Forsyth, Christopher, (1988) “The Provenance and Protection of Legitimate Expectations in Administrative Law” Cambridge Law Journal 47, 238.
Groves, Matthew, (2008) “Substantive Legitimate Expectations in Australian Administrative Law” Melbourne University Law Review 32, 470.
Hilson, Chris, (2002])“Judicial Review, Policies and the Fettering of Discretion” Public Law 111.
Hilson, Chris, (2006) “Policies, the Non-Fetter Principle and the Principle of Substantive Legitimate Expectations: Between a Rock and a Hard Place?” Judicial Review 11, 289.
Job, Jenny, and Reinhart, Monika, (2003) “Trusting the Tax Office: Does Putnam’s Thesis relate to Tax?" Australian Journal of Social Issues 38, 307.
Kirby, Sir Michael, (2008) “Australia’s Growing Debt to the European Court of Human Rights” Monash University Law Review 34, 239.
Mason, Robert, and Calvin, Lyle, (1984) “Public Confidence and Admitted Tax Evasion” National Tax Journal 37 , 489.
Mason, Sir Anthony, (2005) “Procedural Fairness: Its Development and the Continuing Role of Legitimate Expectations” Australian Journal of Administrative Law 12, 103.
McBride, Jeremy, (1979) “Damages as a Remedy for Unlawful Administrative Action” Cambridge Law Journal 38, 323.
Murphy, Kristina, (2004) “The Role of Trust in Nurturing Compliance: A Study of Accused Tax Avoiders” Law and Human Behaviour 28 , 187.
Roberts, Michael, and Hite, Peggy, (1994) “Progressive Taxation, Fairness and Compliance” Law and Policy 16, 27.
Roots, Lachlan, (1993) “A Tort of Maladministration: Government Stuff-Ups” Alternative Law Journal 18, 67.
Scholz, John, (1998) “Trust, Taxes and Compliance” in Valerie Braithwaite and Margaret Levi (eds), Trust and Governance, 135.
Schwartz, Bernard, (1962) An Introduction to American Administrative Law (New York: Oceana Publishing,).
Sheffrin, Steven, and Triest, Robert, (1992) “Can Brute Deterrence Backfire? Perceptions and Attitudes in Tax Compliance” in Joel Slemrod (ed), Who Pays Taxes and Why? Tax Compliance and Enforcement 193.
Stewart, Cameron, (2000) “Substantive Unfairness: A New Species of Abuse of Power?” (2000) Federal Law Review 28 , 617.
Virgo, Graham, (2000) “Cheating the Public Revenue” Cambridge Law Journal 59 , 42.
Virgo, Graham, (2002) “Cheating the Public Revenue: Fictions and Human rights” Cambridge Law Journal 61, 47.
Walpole, Michael, (2001) “Taxpayer Rights and Remedies - Australia, New Zealand and China” in Second World Tax Conference (Dublin: Institute of Taxation,).
Wheelright, Karen, (1998) “Taxpayers’ Rights in Australia” in Duncan Bentley (ed), Taxpayers’ Rights: An International Perspective (Gold Coast: Revenue Law Journal), 57.
Case Law
AGC (Investments) Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1991) 91 ATC 4180.
Ando Minerals NL v Deputy Federal commissioner of Taxation (1994) 94 ATC 4163.
Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1.
Bellinz v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1998) 155 ALR 220.
Bourne v HMRC (Bourne) [2010] UKFTT 294 (TC).
Commissioner of Taxation v Futuris Corporation Ltd (2008) 237 CLR 146.
Congreve v Inland Revenue Commissioners (1948) 30 TC 163 (HL).
Constable Holdings Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1987) 72 ALR 265.
Corkteck Ltd v HMRC [2009] EWHC 785 (Admin).
Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 141 ALR 713.
David Jones Finance & Investments Pty Ltd v FCT (1991) 21 ATR 1506.
FCT v Patcorp Investments Ltd (1976) 6 ATR 420.
FCT v Wade (1951) 84 CLR 105.
Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Biga Nominees Pty Ltd (1988) 88 ATC 4270.
Gemeente Leusden v Staatssecretaris van Financien (C-487/01 and C-7/02) [2004] ECR I-5337; [2007] STC 776.
Harris v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (Harris) (2001) 47 ATR 406.
Hobbs, Richard, Walsh and Geen v United Kingdom [2006] ECHR 63684/00.
Inland Revenue Commissioners v National Federation of Self-Employed and Small Business Ltd [1981] UKHL 2, 18; [1981] STC 260.
Intervest Corporation Pty Ltd v FCT (1984) 3 FCR 591.
Latilla v Inland Revenue Commissioners (1943) 25 TC 107 (CA.
Lucas v O’Reilly (1979) 79 ATC 4081.
Mavridis v Parliament (Mavridis) (C-289/81) [1983] ECR 1733.
McKinney v Regan 599 F.Supp. 126, 129-30 (M.D. La. 1984).
Moreau v FCT (1926) 39 CLR 65.
Pickering v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1997) 37 ATR 41.
R. v Allen [2001] UKHL 45; [2001] STC 1537.
R. v Commissioners of Inland Revenue Ex p. Wilkinson [2005] UKHL 30; [2006] STC 270.
R. v Dimsey [2001] UKHL 46; [2001] STC 1520.
R. v North and East Devon Health Authority Ex p. Coughlan [1999] EWCA Civ 1871.
R. v Inland Revenue Commissioners Ex p. MFK Underwriting Agencies Ltd (MFK Underwriting) [1990] 1 WLR 1545, 1569-1570; [1989] STC 873.
R. v Inland Revenue Commissioners Ex p. Preston [1984] UKHL 5; [1985] STC 282.
R. v Inland Revenue Commissioner Ex p. Unilever plc [1996] STC 681 (CA).
Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs: Ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1.
Tooheys Ltd v Minister for Business & Consumer Affairs (1981) 36 ALR 64.
United States v Craig, 73 A.F.T.R.2d 1099 (D.N.D. 1994).
Vestey v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1977] STC 414.
Vestey v Inland Revenue Commissioners (No. 2) [1978] STC 567 (HC).
Watson v HM Customs and Excise (2004) (VAT18675).
Legislation
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth).
Commissioner for Revenue and Customs Act 2005 (UK).
Human Rights Act 1998 (UK).
Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 (UK).
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth).
Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Pub L No 105-206, 112 Stat 685 (1998).
Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth).
Public Service Act 1999 (Cth).
Public Service Regulations 1999 (Cth).
Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth).
Taxes Management Act 1970 (UK).
Papers, Reports and Other Sources
Australian Joint Committee of Parliamentary Accounts, Report 326 - An Assessment of Tax (1993).
Australian Public Service Commission, “APS Code of Conduct” available at http://www.apsc.gov.au/aps-employment-policy-and-advice/aps-values-and-code-of-conduct/code-of-conduct [Accessed 1 February 2013].
Australian Taxation Office, “Our Service Standards” available at http://www.ato.gov.au/corporate/distributor.aspx?menuid=0&doc=/content/25940.htm&page=2#P24_2573 [Accessed 1 February 2013].
Australian Taxation Office, Annual Report 2010-11 (2011).
Australian Taxation Office, “Stakeholder Consultation Overview” available at http://www.ato.gov.au/corporate/content.asp?doc=/content/00131220.htm&mnu=430198mfp=001 [Accessed 1 February 2013].
Australian Taxation Office, “Taxpayers’ Charter: What You Need to Know” available at http://www.ato.gov.au/content/downloads/cor63133_n2548.pdf [Accessed 20 April 2012], foreword.
Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, “Your Charter” available at http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/charter/charter.pdf [Accessed 12 April 2012].
HM Revenue & Customs, “Business Plan 2011-2015” available at http://www.number10.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/HMRC-Business-Plan.pdf [Accessed 21 April 2012].
HM Revenue & Customs, “HMRC Service Standards for Excise, Customs, Stamp Taxes and Money Services Customers” available at http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/customs/ecsm-service-standards.pdf> [Accessed 1 February 2013].
House of Commons. Treasury Committee, Administration and Effectiveness of HM Revenue and Customs - Sixteenth Report of Session 2010-12 (2011), (Session 2010-11), Vol. 1.
OECD, Centre for Tax Policy and Administration, Principles of Good Tax Administration (2001), OECD, Practice Note GAP0013.
OECD, Committee of Fiscal Affairs Working Party, “Taxpayers Rights and Obligations - A Survey of the Legal Situation in OECD Countries” (Paper Number 8, OECD, 1990).
Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman, Commonwealth of Australia, To Compensate or Not to Compensate? Own Motion Investigation of Commonwealth Arrangements for Providing Financial Redress for Maladministration (1999).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 John Bevacqua
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our open access status means that authors retain the copyright of their work. However, all papers published in JOTA are done so under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY). This means that others can share and/or adapt your work without your permission as long as they follow certain rules, including attributing your work correctly.
You can learn more about this on our Open Access, Licensing, and Copyright Policies page.
